UI Conferences

Conference Policies

Peer Review Process

All papers are single-blind peer-reviewed. Each paper is assigned to at least two reviewers. The referees evaluate the papers according to the following criteria:​

Abstract:

  1. Title
  2. Background
  3. Methods
  4. Results
  5. Conclusions/Significance
Full Paper:
  1. Relevance to Conference Scope
  2. Originality
  3. Contribution
  4. Technical Quality
  5. Depth of Research

The review result of the full paper consist of the following:

  1. Accepted
  2. Requires minor/major revision
  3. Rejected

 

Archive Access Policy

The presentations that make up the current and archived conferences on this site have been made open access and are freely available for viewing, for the benefit of authors and interested readers.

 


draja777

hadiah138

situs slot gacor

daftar toto700

slot demo

Judi Bola

Sabung Ayam

Judi Ayam

slot server luar

slot gacor

dayak777

toto

slot gacor

uangwin

uangwin

yuantoto

mixslot

paristogel

slot gacor hari ini

toto slot

https://www.henrymotorgroup.com/about-us/

slot gacor maxwin

Slot Gacor

poker idn

slot 777