Peer Review Process

All papers are single-blind peer-reviewed. Each paper is assigned to at least two reviewers. The referees evaluate the papers according to the following criteria:​

Abstract:

1. Title
2. Background
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Conclusions/Significance

1. Relevance to Conference Scope
2. Originality
3. Contribution
4. Technical Quality
5. Depth of Research

The review result of the full paper consist of the following:

1. Accepted
2. Requires minor/major revision
3. Rejected

Archive Access Policy

The presentations that make up the current and archived conferences on this site have been made open access and are freely available for viewing, for the benefit of authors and interested readers.