Peer Review Process

All submitted manuscripts will undergo a double-blind peer review process, where both authors and reviewers remain anonymous.

Each manuscript will be evaluated based on:

• originality and contribution to the field
• relevance to the conference scope and theme
• methodological rigor and academic validity
• clarity of presentation and structure

• significance for library, archival, and information science studies

Based on the reviewers’ recommendations, manuscripts may be:

• Accepted
• Accepted with minor revisions
• Required major revisions

• Rejected

Accepted manuscripts will proceed to the revision stage prior to final publication consideration in SINTA 2–5 accredited journals.

Authors are required to submit a detailed response to reviewers’ comments during the revision process. Final publication decisions are determined by both reviewer evaluations and the quality of author revisions.

Archive Access Policy

The presentations that make up the current and archived conferences on this site have been made open access and are freely available for viewing, for the benefit of authors and interested readers.

The 4th APRiSH : “Network Society: Continuity and Change”

The Asia-Pacific Research in Social Sciences and Humanities (APRiSH) is aiming for getting new ideas, design, and model from many social-sciences scholars through their papers. It is The 3-days conference has been conducted since 2016 and organized by different faculty every year. Faculty of Psychology was the first organizer, Faculty of Art and Humanities was the second-host. In the 2019, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences will be the host of 4th APRiSH.

The APRiSH will be followed into seven major of social-sciences; Economic and Business, Social and Political Sciences, Arts and Humanities, Psychology, Law and Justice, and Administrative Sciences. Graduate, Post-graduate Students, academicians, and public-professional participants are able to join the conference.