Peer Review Process

All submitted manuscripts will undergo a double-blind peer review process, where both authors and reviewers remain anonymous.

Each manuscript will be evaluated based on:

• originality and contribution to the field
• relevance to the conference scope and theme
• methodological rigor and academic validity
• clarity of presentation and structure

• significance for library, archival, and information science studies

Based on the reviewers’ recommendations, manuscripts may be:

• Accepted
• Accepted with minor revisions
• Required major revisions

• Rejected

Accepted manuscripts will proceed to the revision stage prior to final publication consideration in SINTA 2–5 accredited journals.

Authors are required to submit a detailed response to reviewers’ comments during the revision process. Final publication decisions are determined by both reviewer evaluations and the quality of author revisions.

Archive Access Policy

The presentations that make up the current and archived conferences on this site have been made open access and are freely available for viewing, for the benefit of authors and interested readers.