Peer Review Process

This conference and its Organizing Committee try to ensure the highest Ethical Standards for all involved parties:

• For Authors
• For Reviewers and Scientific Committees Members
• For Publisher

---

FOR REVIEWERS

• Scientific quality: Peer review is essential part  for scientific publication. Based on Reviewers decision and comments are selected papers for final presentation and publication. If necessary authors are asked to make revision of their submissions.
• Promptness: Any selected reviewer who feels unqualified to review for chosen manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
• Confidentiality: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to, or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
• Standards of Objectivity: Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
• Acknowledgement of Sources: Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
• Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Archive Access Policy

The presentations that make up the current and archived conferences on this site have been made open access and are freely available for viewing, for the benefit of authors and interested readers.

About INSC

A healthy nurse as “someone who actively focuses in creating and maintaining a balance and synergy of physical, intellectual, emotional, social, spiritual, personal and professional wellbeing” (ANA, 2017). ANA was declaring 2017 to be Year of the Healthy Nurse.

Nurses have been becoming as frontliners of the healthcare services especially in primary care. Nurses are ideally positioned to be the best role model, educators, and advocates of health, safety and wellness. They must life healthy to fulfill their capacity for their familily, their communities and work enviroment.

Nurses as the biggest population in health care and the most trusted profession have the power to make a change. Nurse can set an axample on how to be healthy and quality of life by choosing nutritious foods, good sleep, physical activity, free tobacco, preventive immunization, managing stress, and protective from hazzard. If all of nurses increase their personal wellness, they will influence to their patiens, family, co-worker, community, and nation.

Nurses have the most contribution to the number of health professionals in Indonesia, who provide service in all level of cares, including the community health centre (puskesmas). In the fact, Nurses who work in outreach area have greater challenges, a wider range of work area and also enviromental hazzard make nurses ignorant in handling health for themselves. We believe that our concern to healthy nurse-healthy nation is powerful to encourage nurses in creating better health for individual, society and the enviroment.