Peer Review Process

Stage 1: Scientific Committee (SC) conducts a review and assessment for the abstracts submittedby participants. SC will provide assessment results from thesubmitted abstracts and 24 abstracts withthe highest score will be selected. For the 24 selected abstracts, the results ofthe review will also be distributed as inputfor writing an extended abstract/full paper.

Stage 2: All 24 submitted extended abstract/fullpapers will be reassessed by SC to beselected into 12 extended abstract/fullpaper. The 12 extended abstract/full paper willbe invited to be presented at theconference. From the 12 extended abstract/full paper,top three best papers will be selected. One paper will be chosen as the bestpaper, which will be judged from theresults of the full paper assessment andpresentation assessment.

Stage 3: The author requires to improve the paper by accommodating inputfrom the discussants and conference participants. The revised results are collected again for review by SC, intended todetermine which papers can continue the publication process ininternational scientific journals and national journals. The top three best papers will be submitted for publication ininternational journals with the Scopus index, while the rest innational journals with the SINTA index. The author adjusts his paper based on the format and provisions ofthe journal recommended by SC. The journal will review and publish selected paper by followingapplicable regulations.

Archive Access Policy

The presentations that make up the current and archived conferences on this site have been made open access and are freely available for viewing, for the benefit of authors and interested readers.